Rated perceived exertion and affective valence in the high intensity interval training: comparison between two popular protocols

  • João Paulo dos Santos Loscheck Silva Departamento de Pós-Graduação, Faculdade de Educação Fí­sica e Esportes, Universidade Santa Cecí­lia, Santos, Brasil
  • Pedro Henrique Martins Ferreira Alves Departamento de Pós-Graduação, Faculdade de Educação Fí­sica e Esportes, Universidade Santa Cecí­lia, Santos, Brasil
  • Leticia Cerrone Andrade Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, Brasil
  • Ricardo José Gomes Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, Brasil
  • Cauê Vazquez La Scala Teixeira Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Santos, Brasil. Faculdade de Educação Fí­sica, Faculdade Praia Grande, Praia Grande, Brasil

Abstract

Introduction and objective: In recent years, high intensity interval training (HIIT) has drawn attention of media and exercise practitioner around the world. Although there are some studies analyzing the physiological and functional effects of HIIT, there are few studies analyzing its perceptual responses, especially in women. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze and compare the rated of perceived exertion (RPE) and affectivity (AFF) between two popular protocols of HIIT. Materials and methods: Twenty health and untrained women (33.8 ± 10.0 years old; BMI: 24.2 ± 3.8 kg/m²) were included in the sample. The volunteers underwent to randomized two HIIT sessions on stationary bicycle. In each session, one different HIIT protocols was used: Tabata and Wingate. After both sessions, RPE and AFF were measured. The date were analyzed by t student (RPE) and Wilcoxon (AFF) tests. Results: Tabata showed higher PSE values than Wingate (17.5 ± 2.3 vs. 13.8 ± 2.3). No significant differences were observed in the AFF between protocols (-2.9 ± 1.1 vs. -2.2 ± 1.3 for Tabata and Wingate, respectively), however Tabata showed medium effect size over Wingate. Conclusion: Tabata protocol was more exhaustive. The AFF response did not differ significantly between protocols, but Tabata showed a medium effect size than Wingate. Thus, Wingate protocol seems to be more interesting to untrained women.

References

-Bentley, R.F.; Bentley, D.C. Short and sweet: cardiovascular and metabolic improvements in just one hour per week. The Journal of Physiology. Vol. 593. Num. 11. 2015. p. 2401-2402.

-Borg, G. Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign. Human Kinetics. 1998.

-Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. VIGITEL Brasil 2014 Saúde Suplementar: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde. 2015.

-Burgomaster, K.A.; Howarth, K.R.; Phillips, S.M.; Rakobowchuk, M.; MacDonald, M.J.; McGee, S.L.; Gibala, M.J. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. The Journal of Physiology. Vol. 586. Num. 1. 2008. p. 151-160.

-Burgomaster, K.A.; Hughes, S.C.; Heigenhauser, G.J.F.; Bradwell, S.N.; Gibala, M.J. Six sessions of sprint interval training increases muscle oxidative potential and cycle endurance capacity in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. Vol. 98. Num. 6. 2005. p. 1985-1990.

-Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale. Routledge. 1988.

-Cress, M.; Porcari, J.; Foster, C. Interval training. ACSM's Health and Fitness Journal. Vol. 19. Num. 6. 2015. p. 3-6.

-Das, P.; Horton, R. Physical activity: time to take it seriously and regularly. Lancet . Vol. 19. Num. 1. 2016. p. 1-5.

-Dishman, R.K. Advances in exercise adherence. Champaign: Human Kinetics. 1994.

-Garber, C.E.;Blissmer, B.; Deschenes, M.R.; Franklin, B.A.; Lamonte, M.J.; Lee, I.M.; Nieman, D.C.; Swain, D.P.; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Medicine Science in Sports and Exercise. Vol. 43. Num. 7. 2011. p. 1334-1359.

-Gillen, J.B.; Gibala, M.J. Is high-intensity interval training a time-efficient exercise strategy to improve health and fitness? Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. Vol. 39. Num. 3. 2013. p. 409-412.

-Gray, S.R.; Ferguson, C.; Birch, K.; Forrest, L.J.; Gill, J.M.R. High-intensity interval training: key data needed to bridge the gap from laboratory to public health policy. Britsh Journal of Sports Medicine. Vol. 50. Num. 20. 2016. p. 1231-1232.

-Hardy, C.J.; Rejeski, W.J. Not what, but how one feels: The measurement of affect during exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Vol. 11. Num. 3. 1989. p. 304-317.

-Kubukeli, Z.N.; Noakes, T.D.; Dennis, S.C. Training techniques to improve endurance exercise performances. Sports Medicine. Vol. 32. Num. 8. 2002. p. 489-509.

-Liz, C.M.; Crocetta, T.B.; Viana, M.S.; Brandt, R.; Andrade, A. Adherence at physical exercises in fitness centers. Motriz. Vol. 16. Num. 1. 2010. p. 181-188.

-Reichert, F.F.; Barros, A.J.D.; Domingues, M.R.; Hallal, P.C. The role of perceived personal barriers to engagement in leisure-time physical activity. American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 97. Num. 3. 2007. p. 515-519.

-Ross, A.; Leveritt, M. Long-term metabolic and skeletal muscle adaptations to short-sprint training. Sports Medicine. Vol. 31. Num. 15. 2001. p. 1063-1082.

-Saanijoki. T; Nummenmaa, L.; Eskelinen, J.J.; Savolainen, A.M.; Vahlberg, T.; Kalliokoski, K.K.; Hannukainen, J.C. Affective responses to repeated sessions of high-intensity interval training. Medicine Science in Sports and Exercise. Vol. 47. Num. 12. 2015. p. 2604-2611.

-Stonerock, G.L.; Blumenthal, J.A. Role of counseling to promote adherence in healthy lifestyle medicine: strategies to improve exercise adherence and enhance physical activity. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2016.

-Thompson, WR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2017. ACSM's Health and Fitness Journal. Vol. 20. Num. 6. 2016. p. 8-17.

Published
2017-09-01
How to Cite
Silva, J. P. dos S. L., Alves, P. H. M. F., Andrade, L. C., Gomes, R. J., & Teixeira, C. V. L. S. (2017). Rated perceived exertion and affective valence in the high intensity interval training: comparison between two popular protocols. Brazilian Journal of Exercise Prescription and Physiology, 11(68), 596-601. Retrieved from https://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/1228
Section
Scientific Articles - Original