Effect of shock-resistant training on C57BL/6 muscular dies, strength, and muscular weight

  • Giovana Evelin de Oliveira Costa Educação Fí­sica Bacharelado da Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (Unimontes), Montes Claros-MG, Brasil.
  • Aldecy Batista de Sá Júnior Educação Fí­sica Bacharelado da Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (Unimontes), Montes Claros-MG, Brasil.
  • Ataualba Ramalho de Meirelles Filho Educação Fí­sica Bacharelado da Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (Unimontes), Montes Claros-MG, Brasil.
  • Magda Mendes Vieira Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (Unimontes), Montes Claros-MG, Brasil.
  • Mariana Rocha Alves Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências da Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói-RJ, Brasil.
  • Alex Sander Freitas Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (Unimontes), Montes Claros-MG, Brasil.
  • Vinicius Dias Rodrigues Professor do Departamento de Educação Fí­sica e do Desporto da Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (Unimontes), Montes Claros-MG, Brasil.
Keywords: Resistance training, Force, Mice

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this article was to verify the effects of resistance training with shock on the diameter, strength, and muscle weight of C57BL/6 mice.  Materials and Methods: An experimental study was carried out, where the animals were divided into a control group (n=5) and an experimental group (n = 5). The experimental group performed 21 resistance exercise sessions. Six sets of eight repetitions were performed with a 90-second interval between sets. The measurement of the relative and absolute muscular strength (FM) of the four limbs was performed using a muscle traction force meter (Bonther®). The Mann-Whitney test was performed to compare the post-pre (delta) difference of the dependent variable and the level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: The results found showed that the difference in the mean absolute FM was significant (p=0.016), but in the absolute FM (p=0.076), in the average relative FM (p=0.175) and in the maximum relative FM (p=0.076), there was no difference. there was a significant difference. Regarding the effect size, the average absolute FM was classified as large (1.13), the maximum absolute FM was classified as large (1.40), the average relative FM was classified as moderate (0.92) and the Maximum relative FM was classified as large (1.46). Conclusion: Resistance training with shock stimulation promoted an increase in muscle strength in the members of the animals in the experimental group, showing a perspective for the continuity of research in order to investigate the effect of this training in various situations related to health and / or performance.

References

-Cassilhas, R. C.; Lee, K. S.; Fernandes, J.; Oliveira, M. G.; Tufik, S.; Meeusen, R; De Mello, M. T. Spatial memory is improved by aerobic and resistance exercise through divergent molecular mechanisms. Neuroscience. Vol. 202. p. 309-317. 2012.

-Hopkins, W.; Marshall, S.; Batterham, A.; Hanin, J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Medicine+ Science in Sports+ Exercise. Vol. 41. Num. 1. p. 3-13. 2009.

-Kenney, W. L.; Wilmore, J. H.; Costill, David. Physiology of sport and exercise 6th edition. Human kinetics. 2015.

-Krüger, K.; Gessner, D. K.; Seimetz, M.; Banisch, J.; Reigseis, R.; Eder, K.; Weissmann, N.; Mooren, F. C. Functional and muscular adaptations in an experimental model for isometric strength training in mice. PloS one. Vol. 8. Num. 11. p. e79069. 2013.

-Mori, T.; Okimoto, N.; Sakai, U.M.; Okazaki, Y.; Nakura, N.; Notomi, T.; Nakamura, T. Climbing exercise increases bone mass and trabecular bone turnover through transient regulation of marrow osteogenic and osteoclastogenic potentials in mice. Journal of bone and mineral research. Vol. 18. Num. 11. p. 2002-2009. 2003.

-Ratamess, N.; Alvar, B.; Evetoch, T. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. American college of sports medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Vol. 41. Num. 3. p. 687-708. 2009.

-Roemers, P.; Mazzola, P. N.; De Deyn, P. P.; Bossers, W. J.; Van Heuvelen, M. J. G.; Van Der Zee, E. A. Burrowing as a novel voluntary strength training method for mice: A comparison of various voluntary strength or resistance exercise methods. Journal of neuroscience methods. Vol. 300. p. 112-126. 2017.

-Rodrigues, J.; Rodrigues, L.; Maria, R.; Murilo, S. Adaptações neurais e fisiológicas em exercícios resistidos para terceira idade. Rev Dig Vida & Saúde. Vol. 1. Num. 3. 2002.

-Rodrigues, V. D.; Moraes, D. P.; Brito, A. S.; Vieira, M. M.; Santos, A. R.; Machado, A. S.; Pereira, L. K. M.; Soares, F. S.; Gomes, E. S. B.; Alves, M. R. A.; Souza, L. R.; Cassilhas, R. C.; Monteiro Júnior, R. S.; Paula, A. M. B. Methodological validation of a vertical ladder with low intensity shock stimulus for resistance training in C57BL/6 mice: Effects on muscle mass and strength, body composition, and lactate plasma levels. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. Vol. 14. Num. 3. 2019

-Tamaki, T.; Uchiyama, S.; Nakano, S. A weight-lifting exercise model for inducing hypertrophy in the hindlimb muscles of rats. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. Vol. 24. Num. 8. p. 881-886. 1992.

-Wilson, J. M.; Loenneke, J. P.; Jo, E.; Wilson, G. J.; Zourdos, M. C.; Kim, J. S. The effects of endurance, strength, and power training on muscle fiber type shifting. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. Vol. 26. Num. 6. p. 1724-1729. 2012.

Published
2021-10-10
How to Cite
Costa, G. E. de O., Sá Júnior, A. B. de, Meirelles Filho, A. R. de, Vieira, M. M., Alves, M. R., Freitas, A. S., & Rodrigues, V. D. (2021). Effect of shock-resistant training on C57BL/6 muscular dies, strength, and muscular weight. Brazilian Journal of Exercise Prescription and Physiology, 14(92), 535-540. Retrieved from https://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/2086
Issue
Vol. 14 No. 92 (2020)
Section
Scientific Articles - Original

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Exercise Physiology and Prescription (RBPFEX)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License BY-NC which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can bring about productive change as well as increase impact and impact. citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).