Horizontal supine exercise: compare the RM executed using Machinery and Free Weight through different intensity individuals experienced not much proficient individuals

  • João Augusto Reis de Moura Fundação Universidade Regional de Blumenau e Universidade do Vale do Itajai- Laboratório de Fisiologia do Exercí­cio LAFEX
  • Jairo Jerônimo Barros Júnior Personal Trainer
  • Mauriti Marcos Cardoso Júnior Personal Trainer
Keywords: Resistance training with weights, Strength, Training methodology

Abstract

This study had as goal to compare the number of Repetitions Maximum (RM) accomplished through different percentages of lRM between the horizontal supineexercise done with Free , Weight (FW) and those executed using Weight Resistance Training (WRT) Machinery (MAC) when experienced individualsnot much proficient individualsare submitted to the effort. Have participated voluntarily in the study 20 men (10experienced individualsand 10 not much proficient individualsto the WRT). First1y the individualsexecuted tests of lRM and after RM tests with two seconds controlled velocity to the eccentric phase and the same time to the movement's concentric phase, in different days, with intensity of 90%, 75% and 60% of IRM in MAC and FW. The ANOVA three factorial (2x3x2 -measurement instrument, % of lRM and familiarization leyel) for repeated measures in the 1° and 2° factor only showed significant differences between the RM avetages forefront the different weight intensities (% of lRM). It is concluded that the RM number does not differ amid MAC still FW at an identcal % of 1 RM such phenomenon also does not show dependence to the individual's familiarization leveI to WRT nevertheless.

References

-American College of Sports Medicine. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Medicine Science and Sports Exercise. Num. 34. 2002. p. 364-80.

-Cabell, L. Zebas, C.J. Resistive torque validation of the Nautilus Multi-Biceps Machine. Journal Strength Conditioning and Research. Vol. 13. Num. 1. 1999. p. 20-3.

-Calbert, J.A.L.; Ortiz, R.A.; Cabrero, J.C.; Garcia, C.D. Comportamiento mecánico del músculo durante el ciclo estiramento-acortamiento (YIII). Consideraciones con respecto al entrenamiento de la fuerza. Archivos de Medicina del Deporte. Vol. 7. Num. 48. 1995. p. 301-309.

-Campos, M.A. Biomecânica da musculação. Rio de Janeiro. Sprint,2000. p. 152.

-Chagas, M.H.; Barbosa, J.R.M.; Lima, F.V. Comparação do número máximo de repetições realizadas a 40 e 80% de uma repetição máxima em dois diferentes exercícios na musculação entre os gêneros masculino e feminino. Revista Brasileira de Educação Fisica e Esportes. Vol. 19. Num. 1. 2005. p. 5-12.

-Cotterman, M.L.; Darby, L.A.; Skelly, W. Comparison of muscle force production using Smith Machine and free weights for bench press and squat exercises. Journal Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 19. Num. 1. 2005. p. 169-176.

-Escamila, R.F.; Fleisig, G.S.; Zheng, N. Effects of technique variations on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press. Medicine and Science and Sports Exercise. Vol. 33. Num. 9. 2001. p. 1552-1566.

-Froehlick, M.; Schmidtbleicher, D.; Emrich, E. Training control in hypertrophy training: Intensity vs repetition. Deutsche Zeitschrift fuer Sportmedizin. Vol. 53. Num. 3. 2002. p. 79-83.

-Hoeger, W.W.K.; Hopkins, D.R.; Barette, S.L. Relationship between repetitions and selected percentages of one repetition maximum: A comparison between untrained and trained males and females. Journal Applied and Sport Science Research. Vol. 4. Num. 2. 1990. p. 47-54.

-Isaac, S. Michael, W.B. Handbook in research and evaluation. San Diego. California. Edits Publishers. 1984. p. 376.

-Kraemer, W.J.; Marchitelli, L.; Gordon, S.E. Hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise protocols. Journal Applied Physiology. Vol. 69. Num. 4. 1990. p. 1442-1450.

-Kraemer, W.J.; Fleck, S.J.; Dziados, J.E. Changes in hormonal concentrations after different heavy-resistance exercise protocols in women. Journal Applied Physiology. Vol. 75. Num. 2. 1993. p. 5974-5604.

-Kraemer, W.J.; Häkkinen, K.; Newton, R.U. Effects of heavy-resistance training on hormonal response patterns in younger vs older men. Journal Applied Physiology. Vol. 87. Num. 3. 1999. p. 982-992.

-Kraemer, W.J.; Gordon, S.E.; Fleck, S.J. Endogenous anabolic hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise in males and females. International Journal Sports and Medicine. Vol. 12. Num. 2. 1991. p. 228-235.

-Lohman, T.G.; Roche, A.; Martorell, R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign Illinois: Human Kinetics Books. 1988.

-Mookerjee, S.; Ratamaes, N.A. Comparison of strength difference and joint action durations between full and partial range-of-motion bench press exercise. Journal Strength Conditioning and Reseach. Vol. 13. Num. 1. 1999. p. 76-81.

-Moura, J.A.R. Efeito do tempo de prática e de indicadores metodológicos do treinamento resistido com pesos sobre o número de repetições máximas obtidas por série em adultos jovens de ambos os sexos. Tese de Doutorado. UFSM. Santa Maria-RS. 2004.

-Moura, J.A.R.; Borher, T.; Prestes, M.T.; Zinn, J.L. Influencia de diferentes ângulos articulares obtidos na posição inicial do exercício pressão de pernas e final do exercício puxada frontal sobre os valores de 1RM. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. Vol. 10. Num. 4 2004. p. 269-74.

-Moura, J.A.; Almeida, H.F.R.; Sampedro, R.M.F. Força Máxima Dinâmica: Uma Proposta Metodológica para Validação do Teste de Peso Máximo em Aparelhos de Musculação. Revista Kinesis, Num. 18. 1997. p. 23-50.

-Moura, J.A.R.; Peripolli, J.; Zinn, J.L. Comportamento da percepção subjetiva de esforço em função da força dinâmica submáxima em exercícios resistidos com pesos. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia do Exercício. Vol. 2. Num. 2. 2003. p. 110-22.

-Pereira, M.I.R. Efeitos de duas velocidades de execução do exercício isotônico (treinamento contra-resistência) no ganho de força e resistência muscular. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Gama Filho. 2001.

-Petroski, E.L. Desenvolvimento e Validação de Equações Generalizadas para Estimativa da Densidade Corporal em Adultos. Tese de Doutorado. UFSM. Santa Maria-RS. 1995.

-Simpson, S.R.; Rozenek, R.; Garhammer. J.; Lacourse, M. Comparison of one repetition maximums between free weight and Universal Machine Exercises. Journal Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 11. Num. 2. 1997. p. 103-6.

-Siri, W.E. Body composition from fluid spaces and density. In: Brozek, J.; Henschel, A. Editors. Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington, DC. National Academy of Science. 1961.

-Signorile, J.F.; Duque, M.; Cole, N. Selective recruitment of the triceps surae muscle with changes in knee angle. Journal Strength Conditioning Reserch. Vol. 6. Num. 3. 2002. p. 433-9.

-Tan, B. Manipulating resistance training program variables to optimize maximum strength in men: review. Journal Strength Conditioning and Research. Vol. 13. Num. 3. 1999. p. 289-304.

-Walker, M.; Sussman, D.; Tamburello, M. Relationship between maximum strength and relative endurance for the Empty-Can exercise. International Sport Rehabilatition. Num. 13. 2003. p. 31-8.

Published
2012-04-04
How to Cite
Moura, J. A. R. de, Barros Júnior, J. J., & Cardoso Júnior, M. M. (2012). Horizontal supine exercise: compare the RM executed using Machinery and Free Weight through different intensity individuals experienced not much proficient individuals. Brazilian Journal of Exercise Prescription and Physiology, 5(30). Retrieved from https://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/391
Section
Scientific Articles - Original