Analysis of 1 RM differences on paralell and full squat movements on the smith machine

  • Natalia Santanielo Curso de Pós-Graduação em Fisiologia do Exercício, turma 2011/2012 -Universidade Federal de São Carlos, UFSCar
  • Júlio César Camargo Alves Programa de Pós graduação Associado UEM/UEL. Curso de pós graduação em fisiologia do exercí­cio turma 2011/2012 - Universidade Federal de São Carlos UFSCar
  • Bruno Ferraresi Scrivante Curso de pós graduação em fisiologia do exercí­cio turma 2011/2012 - Universidade Federal de São Carlos UFSCar
  • Cassio Mascarenhas Robert-Pires Centro de Estudos em Fisiologia do Exercí­cio, Musculação e Avaliação Fí­sica - CEFEMA
  • Rodrigo Ferro Magosso Centro de Estudos em Fisiologia do Exercí­cio, Musculação e Avaliação Fí­sica - CEFEMA
Keywords: 1RM test, Range of motion, Squat

Abstract

One repetition maximum (1RM) testing has been used as an indirect form of evaluating muscle strength and quantifying training intensity, however, one must know the fator that may influence the results. The purpose of the study wasto compare 1RM values for parallel squat (PS) and complete squat (CS) on a Smith machine. 16 healthy and physically active male subjects (age 25,2 ± 5,8 years, body mass 83,7 ± 8,4 kg). The 1RM tests were performed for each exercise on two separate ocasions randomly and 48-hour appart. Tests consisted of a warm up of 10 repetitions without additional weight to the machine, followed by 3 to 5 attempts with a 3-minute rest interval to find 1RM. Data analysis was made with Shapiro-Wilk normality test and Sudent’s t test for paired samples. Significance level was set at p‹0,05. Results are expressed as means ± SD. 1RM values for PS and CS were 103,8 ± 25,4 kg e 73,3 ± 19,8 kg, respectivelly (p‹0,01), with a percent reduction of 28,7 ± 10,1%. These results allowus to conclude that there is a significant difference between PS and CS, therefore 1RM test must be performed on the specif range of motion applied during training.

References

-American College Of Sports Medicine. Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults. Medicine& Science In Sports & Exercise. 2009.

-Bird, S. P.; Tarpenning, K. M.; Marino, F. E. Designing Resistance Training Programmes to Enhance Muscular Fitness A Review of the Acute Programme Variables. Sports Med. Vol. 35. Núm. 10. p. 841-851. 2005.

-Caresitano, A.; Moss, R. F.; Pellinger, T. K.; Woodruff, K.; Lewis, V. C.; Booth, W.; Khadra, T. The effect of back squat depth on the EMG activity of 4 superficial hip and thogh muscles. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 16. Núm. 3. p. 428-432. 2002.

-Drinkwater, E.J.; Moore, N. R.; Bird, S. P. Effects of changing from full range of Motion to partial range of motion on squat kinetics. J.Strength Cond. Res. Vol. 26. Núm. 4. p. 890-896. 2012.

-Folland, J. P. E.; Williams, A.G. the adaptations to strength training morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med. Vol. 37. Núm. 2. p. 145-168. 2007.

-Granzier, H.L. Activation and stretch-induced passive force enhancement-are you pulling my chain? Focus on “Regulation of muscle force in the absence of actin-myosin-based cross-bridge interaction” Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. Vol. 299. p. C11-C13. 2010.

-Maior, A. S.; Marmelo, S.; Marques-Neto, S. Perfil do EMG em relação a duas angulações distintas durante a contracção voluntária isométrica máxima no exercício de agachamento. Motricidade. Vol. 7. Núm. 2. p. 77-84. 2011.

-Moura, J.A.R.; Borher, T.; Prestes, M. T.; Zinn, J. L. Influência de diferentes ângulos articulares obtidos na posição inicial do exercício pressão de pernas e final do exercício puxada frontal sobre os valores de 1RM. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte. Vol. 10. Núm. 4. 2004.

-Pereira, M.I.R.; Gomes, P.S.C. Testes de força e resistência muscular: confiabilidade e predição de uma repetição máxima -Revisão e novas evidências. Rev Bras Med Esporte. Vol. 9. Núm. 5. 2003.

-Ronei, P.S; Gomes, N. Radaelli, R.; Botton, C. E.; Brown, L. E.; Bottaro, M. Effect of range of motion on muscle strength and thickness. J. Strength Cond. Res. Vol. 26. Núm. 8. p. 2140-2145. 2012.

-Simão, R. F.; Cáceres, M. S.; Burger, F.; Kovalczyk, L. Lemos, A. Teste de 1RM e prescrição de exercícios resistidos. Revista eletrônica da escola de educação física e desportos -UFRJ. Vol. 2. Núm. 2. 2006.

-Spineti, J.; Salles,B. F.; Rhea, M. R.; Layigne, D; Matta, T; Miranda, F; Fernandes, L.; Simão, R. Influence of exercise order on maximum strength and muscle volume in nonlinear periodized resistance training. J. Strength Cond. Res. Vol. 24. Núm. 11. p. 2962–2969. 2010.

-Tan, B. Manipulating resistance training program variables to optimize maximum strength in men: A review. J. Strength Cond. Res. Vol. 13. Núm. 3. p. 289-304. 1999.

-Wernbom, M.; Augustsson, J.; Thomeé, R. The Influence of frequency, intensity, Volume and Mode of Strength Training on Whole Muscle Cross-Sectional Area in Humans. Sports Med. Vol. 37. Núm. 3. p. 225-264. 2007.

Published
2012-12-09
How to Cite
Santanielo, N., Alves, J. C. C., Scrivante, B. F., Robert-Pires, C. M., & Magosso, R. F. (2012). Analysis of 1 RM differences on paralell and full squat movements on the smith machine. Brazilian Journal of Exercise Prescription and Physiology, 6(36). Retrieved from https://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/465
Section
Scientific Articles - Original

Most read articles by the same author(s)