Monitoring of training load through Borg, forter and pain subject perception scales

  • Adriana Boldrini dos Santos Faculdade de Americana
  • Wallace de Assis Cruz Faculdade de Americana - FAMUniversidade Metodista de Piracicaba - UNIMEP
  • Roger Pinho Willian dos Santos Pinho Faculdade de Americana - FAM Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba - UNIMEP
  • Fernanda Schmidt Schmidt Faculdade de Americana - FAM
  • Tiago Braz Volpi Braz Mestre em Educação Física pela UNIMEP e Professor do Departamento de Educação Física da Faculdade de Americana-FAM, São Paulo, Brasil
  • Charles Ricardo Lopes Faculdade Adventista de Hortolândia - UNASP. Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba - UNIMEP
Keywords: Subjective perception, Physical activity, Training load

Abstract

The aimof the present study focused on the monitoring of training load through subject perception scales, during physical activity program, aimed to health. Materials and methods: The selection ofindividuals in the sample was the type non-probabilistic, by convenience, performed among the participants of a guided program of physical activity form Health Department of Americana / SP. Thus, 38 subjects participated (48 ± 12.2, 73.1 ± 11.4 kg, 1.74 ±0.13 m; VO2max 22.62 ± 6.74 ml.kg.min-1), being 32 women and 6 men, submitted to 6 training sessions performedin 2 sequential micro cyclestraining, being in sessions 1 (S1), 3 (S3) 4 (S4) and 6 (S6) were executed 30 minutes of running exercises or walking ones and 15 minutes of resistance exercise force. In S2 and S5 30 minutes of exercise endurance and strength were performed following 30 minutes of flexibility by dynamic and static method. The variables studied were analyzed and their results were expressed in average and standard deviation, which presented a direct relation with the intensity of the exercises executed. The values of PSDmmii were higher when compared to other corporal segments. The same way in Borg, the answers had a great relation withPSD. There was accumulated tiredness in Borg, due to the accumulation of the sessions, whereas S6 obtained the highest response. For MAG, the sessions of higher values were S4 and S6, both with metabolic predominance. Subjective Perceptions appeared, therefore, efficient for monitoring of raining load.

Author Biographies

Adriana Boldrini dos Santos, Faculdade de Americana

Professora na área do treinamento - musculação-natação

Wallace de Assis Cruz, Faculdade de Americana - FAMUniversidade Metodista de Piracicaba - UNIMEP

Professor na área do treinamento - musculação

Roger Pinho Willian dos Santos Pinho, Faculdade de Americana - FAM Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba - UNIMEP
Professor na área do treinamento - musculação
Fernanda Schmidt Schmidt, Faculdade de Americana - FAM

Professora na área do treinamento voltado Qualidade de Vida e saúde

Tiago Braz Volpi Braz, Mestre em Educação Física pela UNIMEP e Professor do Departamento de Educação Física da Faculdade de Americana-FAM, São Paulo, Brasil

Mestre em Educação Fí­sica pela UNIMEP e Professor do Depto. de Educação Fí­sica da Faculdade de Americana/FAM - SP.

References

-ACSM. Manual do ACSM para avaliação da aptidão física relacionada à saúde.3ª edição. Rio de Janeiro. Guanabara Koogan. 2011.

-American Heart Association. Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Vol. 104. p. 1694-17402. 2001.

-Borg, G. A. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Madison. Vol. 14. Núm. 5. p. 377-381. 1982.

-Borresen, J.; Lambert, M. I. The quantification of training load, the training response and the effect on performance. Sports Med. Vol. 39. Núm. 9. p. 779-795. 2009.

-Clarkson, P.M.; Hubal, M. J. Exercise-induced muscle damage in humans. Am J Physical medicine & rehabilitation. Vol. 81. Núm. 11-S. p. S52-69. 2002.

-Eston, R. Use the ratings of perceived exertion in sports. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. Vol. 7. Núm. 2. p. 175-182. 2012.

-Foster, C.; e colaboradores. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Champaign. Vol. 15. Núm. 1. p. 109-115. 2001.

-Foster, C. Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome. Medicine and Science in Sportsand Exercise. Hagerstown. Vol. 30. Núm. 7. p. 1164-1168. 1998.

-Impellizzeri, F. M.; Rampinini, E.; Coutts, A. J.; Sassi, A.; Marcora, S. M. Use of RPE-based training load in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Vol. 36. Núm. 6. p. 1042-1047. 2004.

-Impellizzeri, F. M.; e colaboradores. Physiological assessment of aerobic training in soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences. Vol. 23. Núm. 6. p. 583-592. 2005.

-Kelly, V. G.; Coutts, A. J. Planning and monitoring training loads during the competition phase in team sports. Strength and Conditioning Journal. Vol. 29. Núm. 4. p. 32-37. 2007.

-Leveritt, M.; Abernethy, P.J.; Barry, B.K.; Logan, P.A. Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training. Sports Medicine. Vol. 28. Núm. 6. p. 413-427. 1999.

-Moreira, A.; e colaboradores. Esforço percebido, estresse e inflamação do trato respiratório superior em atletas de elite de canoagem. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte. Vol. 23. Núm. 4. p. 355-363, 2009.

-Nakamura,F. Y.; Moreira, A, Aoki, M. S. Monitoramento da carga de treinamento: a percepção subjetiva do esforço da sessão é um método confiável? R. da Educação Física-UEM. Vol. 21. Núm. 1. p. 1-11. 2010.

-Nosaka, K.; Newton, M. Difference in the magnitude of muscle damage between maximal and submaximal eccentric loading. J Strength Cond Res. Vol. 16. Núm. 2. p. 202-208. 2002.

-Scanlan, A.T.; Wen, N.; Tucker, P.S.; Dalbo, V.J. The relationships between internal and external training load models during basketball training. J Strength Cond Res. 2014.

Published
2015-05-06
How to Cite
dos Santos, A. B., Cruz, W. de A., Pinho, R. P. W. dos S., Schmidt, F. S., Braz, T. B. V., & Lopes, C. R. (2015). Monitoring of training load through Borg, forter and pain subject perception scales. Brazilian Journal of Exercise Prescription and Physiology, 9(52), 121-128. Retrieved from https://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/731
Section
Scientific Articles - Original