Efectos de los protocolos de entrenamiento de fuerza de series únicas versus series múltiples sobre las variables morfofuncionales en mujeres entrenadas recreativamente

  • Saulo Rodrigo Sampaio Soares Programa de Pós-Graduação Lato Sensu da Universidade Gama Filho - Fisiologia do Exercí­cio: Prescrição do Exercí­cio. Graduado em Educação Fí­sica - Licenciatura Plena pela Universidade Tiradentes (UNIT). Aracaju - SE
Palabras clave: Entrenamiento de fuerza, Serie, Volumen

Resumen

Establecer la cantidad óptima de entrenamiento de fuerza, tanto cuantitativa como cualitativamente, es un desafío para la ciencia del entrenamiento, que culmina en un extenso debate de series únicas versus series múltiples. El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar y comparar los efectos de programas de series múltiples y series únicas. La población de la muestra estuvo conformada por 7 mujeres entrenadas recreativamente (27 a 28 años) (4 a 5 años) divididas aleatoriamente en dos grupos: 3MI-1MS y 3MS-1MI, con una frecuencia de 3 veces por semana durante un periodo de 12 semanas. Se evaluó la composición corporal (peso, %G, masa magra y masa grasa) y el test de 10RM en 3 ejercicios (prensa de piernas, curl con barra y press de banca vertical) en los momentos pre y post entrenamiento. El análisis estadístico de los datos fue la prueba T de Student con ANOVA - 2 X 2 para p > 0,05 con un nivel de significación del 95 %. Los resultados demostraron que no hay diferencias en la composición corporal en ambos grupos, a pesar de registrar ganancias de fuerza significativas para las pruebas de 10RM. Los hallazgos demostraron que el grupo 3MI-1MS logró mayores mejoras en la fuerza que el grupo 3MS-1MI. Estos resultados divergen de la literatura científica, a veces dando ventaja a la aplicabilidad de programas de series múltiples, a veces de series únicas. Los datos del estudio mostraron que los grupos no lograron cambios en la composición corporal, a pesar de las ganancias de fuerza con la superioridad del grupo 3MI-1MS sobre el 3MS-1MI.

Citas

- ACSM, Position stand: Progression Models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 34:364-380. 2002.

- Berger, R.A: Response to “Berger in retrospect: effect of varied weight training programmes on strength”. Br. J. Sports Med. 37; 372-373. 2003.

- Campos, G.E.R; Luecke, T. J; Wendeln, H. K; Toma, K; Hagerman, F. C; Murray, T. F; Ragg, K. E; Ratamess, N. A; Kraemer, W. J; Staron, R. S. Muscular Adaptation in response to three different reistance training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eu. J. Appl Physiol. 88: 50-60. 2002.

- Candow, D.G; Burke, D.G. Effect of Short-Term Equal-Volume Resistance Training With Different Workout Frequency on Muscle Mass and Strength in Untrained Men and Women. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 21(1), 204-207. 2007.

- Carpinelli, R.N. Berger in retrospect: effect of varied weight training programmes on strength. Br. J. Sport Med. 36: 319-324. 2002.

- Carpinelli, R.N. Science versus Opinium. Br. J. Sport Med. 38; 240-242. 2004.

- De Bock, K; Richter, E.A; Russell, A.P; Eijinde, B.O; Dreane, W; Ramaekers, M; Koninckx, E; Leger, B: Verhaeghe, J; Hespel, P. Exercise in the fasted state facilitates fibre type-specific intramyocellular lipid breakdown and stimulates glycogen resynthesis in humans. J. Physiol. 5642, pp 649-660. 2005.

- DiFrancisco – Donoghue, J.; Werner, W; Douris, P. C. Comparison of once–weekly and twice- weekly strength training in older adults. Br. J. Sport Med. 41; 19-22. 2007.

- Folland, J.P; Irish, C.S; Roberts, J.P.C; Tarr, J.E; John, D.A. Fatigue is not a necessary stimulus for strength gains desring resistance training. Br. J. Sport Med. 36: 3701-374. 2002.

- Galvão, D.A.; Traffe, D.R. Resistance Exercise Dosage in Older Adults: Single-Versus Multiset effetcts on Physical Performance and Body Composition. Journal American Geriatrics Society. 53:2090-2097. 2005.

- Gentil, Paulo. Base Científicas do Treinamento de Hipertrofia/ Paulo Gentil. – Rio de Janeiro; 2ª edição: Sprint, 2006.

- Gentil, P; Oliveira, E.; Rocha Jr, V.A.; Carmo, J.; Botaro, M. Effects do Exercise Order on Upper-Body Muscle Activation and Exercise Performance. Journal of Strenght and Conditioning Research, 21(4), 1082-1086. 2007.

- Gonzáles – Badillo, J.J.; Gorostiaga, E.M.; Arellano, R.; Izquierdo, M. Moderate Resistance Training Volume Produces More Favorable Strenght Gains than High or Low Volumen During a Short-Term Training Cycle. Journal of Strenght and Conditioning Research, 19(3), 689-697. 2005.

- Gonzáles – Badillo, J.J.; Izquierdo, M.; Gorostiaga, E.M. Moderate Volume of High Relative Training Entensity produces greater strenght gaisn compared with Lo won High Volumen in Competitive Weightlifters. Journal and Strength on Conditioning Research, 20(1), 73-81. 2006.

- Hass, C.J.; Garzarella, L.; De Hoyos, D.; Pollack, M.L. Single versus multiple sets in long-term recreational weightlifters. Med. Scie. Sports. Exerc. 235-242. 1999.

- Humburg, H.; Baars, H.; Schoder, J.; Reer, R.; Braumann, K.M. 1-Set vs. 3 Set Resistance Training: A Crossover Study. Journal and Strength on Conditioning Research, 578-582. 2007(2).

- Izquierdo, M.; Ibanez, J.; González-Badillo, J.J.; Hakkinen, K.; Ratmess, N.A.; Kraemer, W.J.; French, D.N.; Eslava, J.; Altadill, A.; Asiain, X.; Gorostiaga, E.M. Differential effects os strength training leading to failure versus not to failure on hormonal response, strength, and muscle power gains. J. Appl. Physiiol 100:1647-1656. 2006.

- Jackson, A.S.; Pollack, M.L.; Ward, A. Generalized equations for predicting body density of women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 12(3):175-81. 1980.

- Kelly, S.B.; Brown, L.E.; Coburn, J.W.; Zinder, S.M.; Gardner, L.M.; Nguyen, D. The Effect of Single Versus Multiple Sets on Strength. Journal and Strength on Conditioning Research, 21(4) 1003-1006. 2007.

- Kemmler, W. K; Lauber, D; Engelke, K; Weineck, J. Effects of Single-Vs. Multiple-Set Reistance Training on Maximum Striength and Body Composition in Trained Postmenopausal Women. Journal and Strength on Conditioning Research, 18(4), 689-708. 2004.

- Kraemer, W. J; Ratamess, N.; Fry, A. C; Triplett-McBride T; Kosiris, L. P; Baver, J. A; Lynch, J. M; Fleck, S. J. Influence of Resistance Training Volume and Periodization on Physiological and Performance Adaptations in Collegiate Women Tennis Players. Am. J. Sport Med. 28; 626-633. 2000.

- Kraemer, W. J; Ninol, B. C; Ratamess, N. A; Gothshalk, L. A; Volek, J. S; Fleck, S. J; Newton, R. U; Hakkinen, K. Changes in Muscle Hypertrophy in Women With Periodized Resistance Training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 697-708. 2003.

- Lima, F. V; Chagas, M. H; Corradi, E. F. F; Sila, G. F; Souza, B. B; Moreira Jr, L. A, Análise de dois Treinamentos com diferentes durações de pausa entre séries baseadas em normativas previstas para hipertrofia muscular em indivíduos treinados. Rev. Bras. Méd. Esporte-Vol. 12, nº 4 – Jul/Ago, 2006.

- Marx, J. O; Ratamess, N. A; Ninol, B. C; Gotshalk, L. A; Volek, J. S; Doht, K; Bush, J. a;Gómez, A. L; Mazzetti, S. A; Fleck, S. J; Hakkinen, K; Newton, R. U; Kraemer, W. J. Low-Volume circuit versus high-volume periodized resistance training in women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. Vol. 33, nº 4, pp: 635-643, 2001.

- Monteiro, W; Simão, R; Farinatti, P. Manipulation of exercise order and its unfluence on the number of repetitions and effort subjective perception in trained women. Rev. Bras. Méd. Esporte-Vol. 11, nº 2 – Mar/Abr, 2005.

- Munn, J; Herbert, R. D; Hancock, M. J; Gan Devia, S. C; Resistance Training for Strength: Effect of Number of Sets and Contraction Speed. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1622-1626. 2005.

- Otto, R. M; Carpinelli, R. N. A Critical Analysis of the Single Versus Multiple Set Debate. Journal of Exercise Physiology. Vol.9, nº 1, 32-57. 2006.

- Paulsen, G; Myklestad, D; Raastad, T. The Influence of Volume of Exercise on Early Adaptation to Strength Training. Journal and Strength on Conditioning Research, 17(1), 115-120.2003

- Peterson, M. D; Rhea, M. R; Alvar, B. Maximizing Strength Development in Athlets: Amet-analysis to determine the dose-response relationship. Journal and Strength on Conditioning Research, 18(2), 377-382.2004.

- Ronnestad, B. R; Egeland, W; Kvamme, N. H; Refsnes, P. E; Kadi, F; Raastad, T. Dissimilar effects of-one and three set strength training on strength and muscle gains in upper and lower body in untrained subjects. Journal and Strength on Conditioning Research, 21(1), 157-163.2007.

- Schlumberger, A; Stec, J; Schmidtbleicher, D. Single – Vs. Multiple – Set Strength Training in Women. Journal and Strength on Conditioning Research, 15(3), 284-289. 2001.

- Silva, R. P; Novaes, J. Oliveira, R. J; Gentil, P. Wagner, D; Bottaro, M. High – Volocity resistance exercise protocols in older women: Effects on cordiovascular response. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 6, 560-567. 2007.

- Winett, Richard A. Meta-Analysis do not support performance of multiple Sets or High Volume Resistance Training. Journal of Exercise Physiology. Vol. 7, nº 4, 10-20. 2004.

Publicado
2011-12-27
Cómo citar
Soares, S. R. S. (2011). Efectos de los protocolos de entrenamiento de fuerza de series únicas versus series múltiples sobre las variables morfofuncionales en mujeres entrenadas recreativamente. Revista Brasileña De Prescripción Y Fisiología Del Ejercicio, 3(13). Recuperado a partir de https://www.rbpfex.com.br/index.php/rbpfex/article/view/144
Sección
Artículos Científicos - Originales